Thursday, March 10, 2011
Maine Memory Network
I would use the Maine Memory Network in my classroom to help students get a better location or historical aspect of maybe a character's placement. I could even have my students working on a project relevant to their location or their current residency and have it be a tool or activity that prompts later feedback on the students surroundings. I may be able to use the historical aspect of Maine in some way to connect it to a metaphorical situation where students use it to reflect on how the history influences who they are and the choices they make. Maine Memory Network would be a good resource to allow my students to see what other schools in Maine are doing. I can also teach my students to use it as a resource to share what we are doing as a school and focus on getting their idea's out their. In this particular instance I could focus on professional writing and the importance of correct grammar and sentence structure if others will be reading my students work.
My Contributions to the WebQuest Wikis
Introduction- Judgement
In this WebQuest students will have to chose a location for their family vacation, either New York City, NY, San Diego, CA or Orlando, FL based on parameters such as cost for airfare, hotels, car rentals, etc. They have to do research to come up with the cheapest means of travel. This is a great example of judgment because it allows the students to act as if they are responsible for planning their own trip and have serious real life situations to consider.
WebQuest Components- Conclusion
A Seperate Peace: A Teenager Experiences World War II This WebQuest was an example of a good conclusion because it briefly explained what the students had to do and praises them for their accomplishments without being too preachy.
Intro analytical
This WebQuest is analytical because it discusses Mary Shelley's images of the monster and the creator and the essential aspects of the pictures that illustrate that. It asks the student to think on a deeper level and it doesn't include any part of the task (so it doesn't spoil what is expected of them.) The intro is all about analyzing Shelley's characters.
Tuesday, March 1, 2011
"How to help someone use a computer"
I really learned how important it is for computer experts and really any expert in a field to be patience, calm and sensitive to new learners because it will help them relate to the learner more and the learner may open up more and explain the difficulties they are having rather then just "shut down."
"Beginners face a language problem: they can't ask questions because they don't know what the words mean, they can't know what the words mean until they can successfully use the system, and they can't successfully use the system because they can't ask questions" (http://polaris.gseis.ucla.edu/pagre/how-to-help.html)
This quote really jumped out at me because it's true, it's really hard to explain what's wrong with the technology if you don't know what any of the terminology means. It's really frustrating for the user and the expert, plus it causes a lot of discouragement.
An important rule to follow that I connected with the most was the one where it said "show me how you did that." I was like wow that's me! I like to show people what I did because as I mentioned my lack of understanding of the machinery limits my explanation. However, in the past most people are like "ok mmhmm alright" and then take over and try and fix it. They never show me HOW or what their doing and it's annoying because I would've liked to show them what I did just in case I missed a crucial point. It was really helpful to know that I wasn't the only one who felt that way.
I really feel like this comes in handy when thinking about how I will be teaching the class about "our" technology because I will know to go slow and not to just speak in acronyms but rather to explain the terminology that I may be using and to be very patient with people's various levels of understanding. Reflecting back on how I learn before doing this project seems like the most helpful thing a teacher could do because it will really help the students produce a better presentation.
How to help someone use a computer
(http://polaris.gseis.ucla.edu/pagre/how-to-help.html)
"Beginners face a language problem: they can't ask questions because they don't know what the words mean, they can't know what the words mean until they can successfully use the system, and they can't successfully use the system because they can't ask questions" (http://polaris.gseis.ucla.edu/pagre/how-to-help.html)
This quote really jumped out at me because it's true, it's really hard to explain what's wrong with the technology if you don't know what any of the terminology means. It's really frustrating for the user and the expert, plus it causes a lot of discouragement.
An important rule to follow that I connected with the most was the one where it said "show me how you did that." I was like wow that's me! I like to show people what I did because as I mentioned my lack of understanding of the machinery limits my explanation. However, in the past most people are like "ok mmhmm alright" and then take over and try and fix it. They never show me HOW or what their doing and it's annoying because I would've liked to show them what I did just in case I missed a crucial point. It was really helpful to know that I wasn't the only one who felt that way.
I really feel like this comes in handy when thinking about how I will be teaching the class about "our" technology because I will know to go slow and not to just speak in acronyms but rather to explain the terminology that I may be using and to be very patient with people's various levels of understanding. Reflecting back on how I learn before doing this project seems like the most helpful thing a teacher could do because it will really help the students produce a better presentation.
How to help someone use a computer
(http://polaris.gseis.ucla.edu/pagre/how-to-help.html)
"Copyright and Fair Use"
In the article "The Educator's Guide to Copyright and Fair Use" they describe how the idea of fair use is to protect "intellectual property" (http://www.techlearning.com/article/17674). They also discuss that it is not that they prohibit teacher's from using resources available to them, in fact it's just that it's important that the teacher's set a good example for the students in giving credit where credit is due.
Question number five in regards to the teacher making copies of the software because there are more students and computers than there is software was a question that really shocked me when I got it wrong. To me I guess I don't know that much about the copyrighting "rules" but if the teacher is just burning the CD to get additional copies it just seems weird that that isn't legal or that that doesn't fall under the copyright rules. The biggest reason this seems so strange or absurd to me is that I don't see any difference between making copies of the disk and making photocopies out of a textbook for students; there still isn't enough material and it's the same thing. Again, it's frustrating for me to put too much input in because I don't much about the rules so it's really hard for me to say that's right or that's wrong(http://www.techlearning.com/article/17674).
Question ten about the teacher finding clip art and music and sharing it with other teachers I really thought would be true because it says it was "file-sharing" so it seems like if it says that then it would be acceptable to share with other teachers. It seems as if it's those things that are the logistical things that I really don't understand and I wouldn't want to make a fuss if I was ultimately wrong and just didn't have enough knowledge about it (http://www.techlearning.com/article/17674).
Question fourteen was really baffling. This was the one where the PTA bought the Disney movie and was just trying to show it to younger kids and it's not accepted under the "Fair Use laws." This was frustrating because in this example I didn't see any difference between what they were doing and what a group of friends who are hanging out and someone brings over a movie is doing. It's the same concept and people don't pay companies to play movies at friends houses' so I don't see the difference at all (http://www.techlearning.com/article/17674).
Number sixteen, where the teacher allows his/her students to use this machine that she bought that "defeats the copy protection" so that her students can use parts of rented movies seems like this should absolutely be unacceptable but this is acceptable and other examples aren't. This seems ridiculous. This doesn't seem like it should be right. It really made me think about how the logic of the Fair Use rules doesn't seem to be accurate (http://www.techlearning.com/article/17674).
Number nineteen about using music in the yearbook surprised me too! I even got this answer correct in the quiz and so far I have only commented on one's that I didn't get correct but this one's explanation said that it wasn't acceptable "because they don't have the permission to use the whole song"
(http://www.techlearning.com/article/17674). Well I would say that if they are using any part of the song and not given permission or not "citing" it then it doesn't fall under the guidelines. It's examples like these that don't make sense because it's like it's acceptable if it's a certain length but if it's over that it's not. That makes it more complicated. It seems as if it's going to be unacceptable then make it unacceptable don't make it more difficult and put time limits that sets it apart from being acceptable to not acceptable.
Number twenty yet again seemed like it didn't make sense to me, but I will reiterate the point I tried to make in the beginning of this blog which is that maybe I just don't understand the rules well enough to make comments. This one was about the science fair and how making copies would only be acceptable if it were being used for educational purposes. What I don't understand is why it isn't acceptable to sell. First off to me, it is just like selling a yearbook to family members, it's the same thing, and they even had permission! It also was under the "fair use guidelines" but yet it's not acceptable. It again goes back to what I said before it seems like it's the nit picky stuff that is what gets people. Another thing, if it was being sold to let's say parents for instance, I don't see how that is not being used as an educational purpose. They can show it future children to help them with project idea's, teachers could buy one and keep it on hand for future students etc. Plus, parents already saw it and it was considered an "educational night" so I don't see why buying the dvd wouldn't be considered educational, it's not like it's a dvd of a talent show, it's a science fair.
I guess the biggest thing I realized is as a future teacher who will be teaching in the 21st century I really need to get caught up on all the "rules" and "guidelines" so I know what to be cautious about.
From "The Educator's Guide to Copyright and Fair Use."
http://www.techlearning.com/article/17674
Question number five in regards to the teacher making copies of the software because there are more students and computers than there is software was a question that really shocked me when I got it wrong. To me I guess I don't know that much about the copyrighting "rules" but if the teacher is just burning the CD to get additional copies it just seems weird that that isn't legal or that that doesn't fall under the copyright rules. The biggest reason this seems so strange or absurd to me is that I don't see any difference between making copies of the disk and making photocopies out of a textbook for students; there still isn't enough material and it's the same thing. Again, it's frustrating for me to put too much input in because I don't much about the rules so it's really hard for me to say that's right or that's wrong(http://www.techlearning.com/article/17674).
Question ten about the teacher finding clip art and music and sharing it with other teachers I really thought would be true because it says it was "file-sharing" so it seems like if it says that then it would be acceptable to share with other teachers. It seems as if it's those things that are the logistical things that I really don't understand and I wouldn't want to make a fuss if I was ultimately wrong and just didn't have enough knowledge about it (http://www.techlearning.com/article/17674).
Question fourteen was really baffling. This was the one where the PTA bought the Disney movie and was just trying to show it to younger kids and it's not accepted under the "Fair Use laws." This was frustrating because in this example I didn't see any difference between what they were doing and what a group of friends who are hanging out and someone brings over a movie is doing. It's the same concept and people don't pay companies to play movies at friends houses' so I don't see the difference at all (http://www.techlearning.com/article/17674).
Number sixteen, where the teacher allows his/her students to use this machine that she bought that "defeats the copy protection" so that her students can use parts of rented movies seems like this should absolutely be unacceptable but this is acceptable and other examples aren't. This seems ridiculous. This doesn't seem like it should be right. It really made me think about how the logic of the Fair Use rules doesn't seem to be accurate (http://www.techlearning.com/article/17674).
Number nineteen about using music in the yearbook surprised me too! I even got this answer correct in the quiz and so far I have only commented on one's that I didn't get correct but this one's explanation said that it wasn't acceptable "because they don't have the permission to use the whole song"
(http://www.techlearning.com/article/17674). Well I would say that if they are using any part of the song and not given permission or not "citing" it then it doesn't fall under the guidelines. It's examples like these that don't make sense because it's like it's acceptable if it's a certain length but if it's over that it's not. That makes it more complicated. It seems as if it's going to be unacceptable then make it unacceptable don't make it more difficult and put time limits that sets it apart from being acceptable to not acceptable.
Number twenty yet again seemed like it didn't make sense to me, but I will reiterate the point I tried to make in the beginning of this blog which is that maybe I just don't understand the rules well enough to make comments. This one was about the science fair and how making copies would only be acceptable if it were being used for educational purposes. What I don't understand is why it isn't acceptable to sell. First off to me, it is just like selling a yearbook to family members, it's the same thing, and they even had permission! It also was under the "fair use guidelines" but yet it's not acceptable. It again goes back to what I said before it seems like it's the nit picky stuff that is what gets people. Another thing, if it was being sold to let's say parents for instance, I don't see how that is not being used as an educational purpose. They can show it future children to help them with project idea's, teachers could buy one and keep it on hand for future students etc. Plus, parents already saw it and it was considered an "educational night" so I don't see why buying the dvd wouldn't be considered educational, it's not like it's a dvd of a talent show, it's a science fair.
I guess the biggest thing I realized is as a future teacher who will be teaching in the 21st century I really need to get caught up on all the "rules" and "guidelines" so I know what to be cautious about.
From "The Educator's Guide to Copyright and Fair Use."
http://www.techlearning.com/article/17674
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)